Kurt Cobain Hates Him So

 Kurt Cobain is one of the most loved dead persons in the world.

And he hated one person who must have financially benefited the most out of Kurt's death. Why? He uses Nirvana or Kurt Cobain in headlines, or titles, or banners in all his media or news releases... for publicity of his albums or singles, or gigs, to all kinds of attention. 

It must be a preemption on the part of Cobain back then when he must have felt that kind of freeloading coming. He has been freeloading on Nirvana and Kurt Cobain's death for a long time now, I heard he's got a book and kind of uncomfortable mentioning Cobain in the book.

When you know for a fact that a person hated you, you should stop using his name and everything about him especially that he is dead! Especially if it is for material gain. But he didn't, like, respect.

I never liked this guy, too. Ever. 

If it was just me wishing he'd stop using Kurt Cobain in whatever he does, I wish he would.

Dear Canadian Foreign Minister Chrystia Freeland

Dear Ms. Freeland:

My attention was drawn to your concern over the libel case of Maria Ressa, an Indonesian-American operating as "journalist" in the Philippines.

Please let me share something of bigger relevance to the working class Filipinos and to your government - the 2 libel cases (CRIMINAL CASE(S) No. 36793-R & No. 36794-R docketed at Baguio RTC Branch 5) filed against me in 2014 by a large group that calls themselves the Canadian Immigration Consultancy or the CIC.

The crux of my blog had been that:
1. This group have different and varied Securities and Exchange Commission registered-names, and several "affiliate" organizations based on the sworn statement of their representative - libel accuser Grace Soriano of Baguio City.
2. They have been operating for eons according to Soriano.
3. At one or several periods of their existence, they received processing fees for the Canadian Embassy - in my blog's time - some sixty-five thousand pesos (US$1270) per applicant or their family. Fees that are refunded by the Canadian Intake Office also called the
Citizenship & Immigration Canada
196 George St. Sydney Nova Scotia BIP 133
4. In a 2009 immigration denial for me, a refund check was sent to me through a CIC "affiliate" called United Brokers, Inc., whose signatory was Erwin John Weisdorf about 4 times. In the first 3 times, the checks were declared "lost" through instruction from CIC to us (aspiring immigrants) to sign a waiver called "Undertaking of Indemnity." 


5. The Canadian Intake Office, it seemed after I reported this practice, does not mind mailing (through regular post) said lost, forged, and encashed checks, transacted through various Bank of the Philippine Island branches. Repeatedly. For years. It did, however, sent me a copy of the last, forged check on my name. My case, according to Soriano, was not an exception but a norm.



 6. There were only 135 of us in one batch of applicants who might have lost their refund checks. But since CIC have been in existence for a while, there could be tens or thousands before or after us that might have also experienced the same thing. Or there could be someone in your government who is linked with this group, or that CIC might even be a larger, global group capitalizing on Canadian immigration to the detriment of their so-called clients and the Canadian government tax-payers???

May I humbly request that you look into this because your positive action will actually be benefiting not only us Filipinos but also Canadian taxpayers.


Sincerely,


Margaret T.
UCI or application number at IRCC: BO52953622

ps

Is the (massive) encashing of stolen and forged checks not considered money laundering?